Thursday, 21 April 2016

The Art Of Whore

Just wanted to share this awesome post from a blog that have been deleted.
Originally Posted on May 21 at 12 AM as a gift to you from Professor Mentu
"The Art of Whore: Why Betas Marry Leftovers by Leap of a Beta" Originally Posted on May 21 at
12 AM as a gift to you from Professor Mentu
Bottom-feeding scum sucking Cory Catfish, thy name is beta.
Thank you for cleaning the algae and fecal remains of bigger, stronger, faster fish from the pond of
society. You are the homeless guy I give my leftovers to, packaged in a glossy takeout box from a
restaurant you could never afford. You, beta, are the malleable putty that fills the karmic gap
between what she wants and what she deserves. If ever there was an exultant scavenger, a happy
beggar, or a willful fool foraging through the rotting leftovers of discarded femdom like a soon-to-
be-roadkill raccoon, it’s you. Thank you for your service.
A man with options would never put a ring on a finger that’s been
wrapped around a dozen
cocks.
A man with options would never pay the ultimate price of commit for a born again virgin
fucktoy.
A man with options would never let his son’s first home be a womb that has seen more trafic
than I-35 during rush hour.
A man with options would never allow the first kiss his newborn son receives to come from lips
that have hosted lotsa cocka.
A man with options would never let his son’s first nourishment come from breasts that can be
viewed on any number of cell phone cameras.
A man with options would never let his son’s first throne be the lap of a woman who has been
passed around like a blunt at a frat party.
A man with options would never be a dickstand for a woman who squandered her youth and
beauty on the men who respected her the least.
A man with options would never consider being the last man standing at the end of the long
line of conquests she racked up while being the Grand Marshal of a rather impressive cock
parade.
Do men with options pass up on whores because of religious ethics? Sometimes. Do men with
options pass up on whores because a promiscuous lifestyle stunts a woman’s ability to bond with
her husband and children?
I reckon. Do men with options avoid committing to whores because of social pride? I certainly
hope so. But there’s one gloriously simple, easy to define and even easier to defend reason why
men with options do not marry whores: They don’t have to.
Beta males have four primary deficits when it comes to making sound relationship decisions,
which leads them to permanently settle down with Gangbang Barbie after the rest of us are done
with her. The Art of Whore: Why Betas Marry Leftovers
1) Their inability to identify a whore/slut due to lack of experience.
Thanks to a lack of experience with women, betas believe that a whore is a filthy girl who will
sleep with anybody. When their pea-sized brains conjure up the idea of a whore, they imagine a
woman who stops a red light, sees a man waiting at a bus stop, and has an unbelievable urge to
put the car in park and go bang him. Betas think a whore is a girl who goes out to the bar four
nights per week and bangs four different men. Dead wrong.
With this deffnition of whore, it’s no wonder betas defend women – they never see a whore. But in
reality, whores are selective. In fact, they’re probably the most selective women in the mating
market.
The Art of Whore is displayed by women who harness their sexual power and unleash it with
stunning accuracy on the men at the top of the social hierarchy – often in a serially monogamous
fashion (with a few "mistakes" along the way for good measure).
Wake up, beta. That nice girl in your social group who has a different boyfriend every three or four
months on average, has casual hookups on vacation, and has that "special friend" who keeps her
warm at night between boyfriends is a two-bit worthless whore. "But wait, Mentu! Most girls do
that these days!" Now you’re getting it. Walk with me.
Whore is not about a number; it’s about her decision-making abilities and the value she assigns to
sexual congress. Women are the gatekeepers of sex, so the men she lets through the gates –
regardless of how many or how few – tells you everything you need to know about her relationship
value. I don’t care if she’s slept with 5 men or 50 men; her sexual past reveals her relationship
worth and ability to make sound decisions.
Take for instance a healthy 28 year old woman. In my experience, your average American woman
has had anywhere between 12 and 23 sexual partners by this time. Let’s call it an average of 17.
A reasonable man would not assume that all 17 men dumped her, or that she dumped all 17; a
myriad of reasons, situations, emotions and circumstances led her to this place. So what does this
tell us?
It tells us that a number of men just had fun with her (promiscuity), she had to bounce a number
of men after she opened her womb to them (bad decision making), and a number of men sampled
a mini relationship with her for a while and decided not to keep her around (low value).
So, beta, which of those three traits – promiscuity, bad decision making, and low value – would
you like to have instilled in your children? Which of those traits do you believe will make her an
excellent wife? Which of these traits do you believe will not increase your likelihood of being
cheated on or landing in divorce court? Can you see yourself waking up in the morning, rolling
over, looking at her and thinking "Thank God I’ve committed to a worthless whore who has a 15
year long track record of making bad decisions?" Of course not. But this leads us to the 2nd
primary defficit of the beta:
2) Their susceptibility to shaming language.
Betas cower in fear and quickly acquiesce when confronted with shaming language. "I’m not like
that anymore", "You can’t judge me", and "A woman’s worth is not decided by her sexual past"
seem to be the go-to responses for women who find themselves in the awkward situation of
justifying why they’ve banged more men than can be comfortably seated in a small Family Diner.
For the record, the correct responses are "yes you are", "yes I can", and when it comes to marriage,
"yes it is." Does promiscuity make her a bad employee? Nope. Does it make her a bad friend? Nah.
Does it make her an evil person who is likely to knock over a liquor store and steal a getaway car?
Not at all.
Does a promiscuous past mean she can’t do good in the community and make profound societal
contributions? Of course not. Does it make her a high-risk marriage partner and a shitty role model
for your children in a society built around the family unit instead of the "it takes a village"
approach?
According to the church, the Centers for Disease Control, your buddy who laughs at you behind
your back, biological evidence, gender anthropologists, a growing number of psychologists, your
own gut instincts, and yours truly, yes it most certainly does.
It always amazes me how betas will agree with a woman that her past education reveals her
dedication to scholarly pursuits, her past work experience reveals her quest to improve her business
acumen, her past payment history reveals her credit worthiness, her past workout routine reveals
her desire for a healthy lifestyle, and her past volunteer efforts reveal her heart of gold, but her past
sexual habits reveal absolutely nothing. That, my beta friend, is The Art of Whore.
If you buy in to that shit, you deserve whatever ill may befall you.
3) Their unnatural dedication to the female definition of "fairness."
Here’s where the rubber meets the road for bottom-feeding beta males.
We’'ve all heard the statement "It’s not fair that a woman who sleeps around is a whore, but men
who sleep around are studs." There’s been more than enough digital ink spilled on this topic in the
manosphere, so I won’t go in to it. Everybody knows it’s easy to be a whore, but hard to be a
player – and society doesn’t award trophies for doing easy shit. It’s not a double standard; it’s
two different standards for two different genders with two different barriers to sexual entry and two
different sets of risk factors.
But forget that for a moment. For the sake of this article, let’s assume that the woman’s
statement is true. That’s right, let’s assume for a moment that there is an unfair evil double
standard afoot.
What the fuck do you care?
If you’re a beta male looking for marriage, it’s not your job to be fair – this is your life, not a
general assembly at the UN. Your job is to and the best mother for your children that you possibly
can.
It doesn’t matter if you banged 5,000 women on camera last night; you need to and the most
competent, capable, qualifed, trustworthy, physically and emotionally stable woman you possibly
can to help raise your children.
Let her worry about your past and whether or not she thinks you’re qualifed to be their father, and
you focus on her qualifcations.
Come to think of it, that’s actually quite fair, wouldn’t you say?
4) Their lack of options.
When it comes to liaising with whores, Alphas are volunteers, and betas are voluntolds. The Art of
Whore is not lost on the Alpha male – they volunteer to use them for what they’re good for, then
pass them of to betas who are voluntold to put a ring on their anger.
Beta, your lack of options is making you weak, distorting your judgment, and may eventually land
your pansy ass in divorce court. The Art of Whore is real, and women work to better their craft
every day. What have you done lately besides make excuses for her?
Women proficient in The Art of Whore get what they want: A decade-long ride on the cock carousel
with no consequences, then a willing hapless beta with open arms, an open mind, and an open
wallet to cushion their landing and finance their recovery.
As long as you’re standing there ready, willing and able, I honestly can’t say that I blame them
for taking you up on your generous offer.
This entry was posted in The Empty Halls of University of Man and tagged Masculine Frame,
Shame the Beta.

No comments:

Post a Comment